Fabian Blog
April 9th, 2020

A talk about Mahatma Gandhi


Mahatma Gandhi Society of Ottawa, 1984. Speech during the symposium held on Monday January 30, 1984 at St. Paul University, Ottawa.

It is singularly appropriate that a symposium on Mahatma Gandhi should take place within the precincts of St. Paul University. Gandhi applied the Sermon on the Mount in a large socio-political setting; perhaps the largest in history as far as application of the Sermon is concerned. The Church departed from the Sermon on the Mount fairly soon after she was accepted by the Roman establishment, and, subsequently, propounded the Doctrine of Just War.

Every age has its share of dominant ideas, for good or evil. I shall mention only two of the dominant ideas of our age: first, nationalism, our golden calf. All calves are sovereign and equal, even if it happens that at times the bigger ones eat up smaller ones. The second dominant idea is the divine right theory of super powers. We have outgrown the divine right theory of kings. But the establishment in North America, Western Europe and Eastern Europe (including the Soviet Union, Australia, New Zealand, Japan etc.) believes in this theory. The Super Powers, according to this theory, are entitled to pursue the arms race even though the very survival of the human race is gravely endangered. You and I need passport and visa to cross national frontiers. But not so, the inter-continental missiles.

This is the setting against which we should look at Gandhi’s thoughts and ideas. He was never a system-builder, and could not care less for self-consistency. He said: “I must say what I feel and think at a given moment, without regard to what I may have said before…..my aim is not to be consistent with my previous statement but be consistent with truth as it may present itself to me at a given moment.”

There is no corpus of Gandhi’s teachings on international relations. I shall mention only a few of his ideas:

The state, is only a technical tool, and not an entity of inherent worth. Gandhi’s idea of the state would roughly correspond to that of Max Weber. For Gandhi, the state is subject to the moral law.

Gandhi has spoken on the international issues of his time such as the persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany, invasion of Abyssinia by Italy, that of China by Japan, and that of Czechoslovakia by Hitler. Gandhi said, for example, the Jews in Germany should have resorted to active non-violence. When it was pointed out to him that what could non-violence do against aerial bombing of China by Japan, Gandhi said that behind the bomb was the man who pushed the button and active non-violence should be able to make an impact on him.

Gandhi was invited, many a time, to Western Europe and to the United States. Responding to one such invitation from the blacks in United States, Gandhi said that he should first complete his task in India, before embarking on saving the world; he was still an imperfect tool of non-violence. On a more philosophical plane, Gandhi was fond of quoting Cardinal Newman “one step enough for me.” As regards the national freedom struggle, Gandhi felt that he was in command and, therefore, laid down the law of non-violence, even when he knew that for the Congress it was only a means, and not an article of faith. When Pandit Nehru’s government decided to send troops to Kashmir to defend Kashmir from invaders from Pakistan, Gandhi did not disagree with the decision.

Sometime before the Second World War, foreign delegations attending an international conference of Christians in Madras, called on Gandhi. He expressed frankly his views on organised Christianity. He quoted the following lines from Shelley’s “Mask of Anarchy”:

Stand ye calm and resolute,Like a forest close and mute,With folded arms and looks which areWeapons of unvanquished war.

And if then the tyrants dare,Let them ride among you there,Slash, and stab, and maim, and hew -What they like, that let them do.

With folded arms and steady eyes, And little fear, and less surprise, Look upon them as they slay, Till their rage has died away.

Then they will return with shame To the place from which they came, And the blood thus shed will speak In hot blushes on their cheek.

Rise like lions after slumberIn unvanquishable number -Shake your chains to earth, like dewWhich in sleep has fallen on you -Ye are many, they are few.

I am told that these lines are not all that well-known. Could you tell me why?

March 5th,2009   category: Speeches   | tags: , , , , , |   

Comments (2) »

K P Fabian — March 12, 2009 @ 2:23 pm

Mahatma’s vision is still very valid these days…

Denis Eugene Arackal — March 18, 2009 @ 3:08 pm

Indian’s will always miss his leadership. We need great leaders like him to prosper.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


Conceptualized, designed and published by Global Media Insight



March 9th, 2020

Why The UNHRC Intervention On CAA Is Justified

January 17th, 2020

Trump and Iran: Who Lost More?

December 24th, 2019

The Catastrophic CAA-NRC Imbroglio

June 15th, 2019

Frank Islam in conversation with Ambassador K P Fabian

October 26th, 2018

How The Largest Air Evacuation in History Unfolded

October 24th, 2018

The Jamal Khashoggi Affair

October 24th, 2018

Reality Check: Where Is The ‘56-Inch’ Chest?

May 25th, 2018

Trump And The Iran Nuclear Deal: Geopolitics And Financial Unipolarity – Analysis

February 15th, 2018

The Mingled Light of Two Bleeding Moons

January 7th, 2018

Cracks in the council

August 21st, 2017

Qatar deserves kudos for handling crisis with maturity and logic

November 22nd, 2016

Triumphant Trump and American Foreign Policy

July 21st, 2016

The Attempted Coup in Turkey: What Next?

July 12th, 2016

The Chilcot Report on Blair and the War on Iraq

January 10th, 2015

Beyond the border - India China Boundary Issues

December 20th, 2014

The Middle Path

August 11th, 2014

Genocide in Gaza and Israel’s tunnel vision – analysis

July 28th, 2014

Israeli impunity and global helplessness

July 2nd, 2014

Can Iraq’s disintegration be prevented?

June 30th, 2014

V. K. Krishna Menon Memorial Lecture 2014

March 20th, 2014

Chess Game over Crimea

March 6th, 2014

Italy Erred in Dealing with Marines Case

February 20th, 2014

Where is Egypt going?

September 12th, 2013


August 15th, 2013


July 21st, 2013


May 5th, 2013


July 30th, 2012

India’s diplomacy is textual, not contextual

March 18th, 2012

Handling terrorism, US style: The march of folly continues

March 7th, 2012

Will Israel attack Iran? It cannot be ruled out.

February 14th, 2011


November 10th, 2010

NIXON, INDIRA AND INDIA: Politics and Beyond

November 10th, 2010


November 10th, 2010

Book Review: A JOURNEY

July 7th, 2010

Book Review: JINNAH AND TILAK: Comrades in the Freedom Struggle

October 29th, 2009


October 4th, 2009

Aristotle vs. Greenspan

October 4th, 2009

Book Review : JINNAH : India-Partition Independence

April 15th, 2009

President Obama: Plans and Impediments

March 5th, 2009

A talk about Mahatma Gandhi

March 5th, 2009

Book Review : The Lexus and the Olive tree: Understanding Globalisation by Thomas L. Friedman

March 5th, 2009

Most unpopular war in history

March 5th, 2009

Book Review: Hannah Arendt and International Relations

March 5th, 2009

India at sixty

March 5th, 2009

Commonsense on terror





Reading Corner